The Problem

Infographic regarding DC's "Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019"
Infographic on DC’s “Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019”

As a matter of both human rights and human dignity, we oppose the commodification of people as objects to sell for sex. Regardless of whether it is regulated or fully decriminalized, prostitution is the organized system whereby human beings are used as public sexual commodities. The sexual exploitation of individuals within this system results in inescapable physical, psychological, and emotional trauma.

Two approaches to prostitution law commonly referred to as legalization and full decriminalization, while distinct from each other, advance the same agenda, namely that: 1) Men should be able to buy and control the bodies of women, men, and transgender persons; and 2) Others should be able to control and profit from the merchandising of people for sex. Both approaches —legalized and fully decriminalized prostitution—unleash the demand for paid sex which, in turn, fuel sexual exploitation, and trafficking and redefine pimping/sex trafficking as an entrepreneurial activity. Thus, both approaches create market-based “on-ramps” to sexual exploitation.

Across the United States, political efforts to normalize the commercial sex industry are popping up, often claiming to protect people in prostitution. Pending before the District of Colombia’s city council, for example, is a bill with the Orwellian title Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019.


DC’s “Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019”: A Trojan Horse Empowering and Expanding the Sex Trade in the Nation’s Capital

Under the guise of improving “community safety and health,” DC Councilmembers David Grosso, Anita Bonds, Brianne Nadeau, and Robert White have put forward the above-referenced bill (23-0318) which, if passed, will amend existing DC statutes to fully decriminalize and deregulate prostitution in the nation’s capital. The proposed bill seeks to decriminalize pimps, brothel-keeping, and sex buyers (i.e., those who “rent” sexual access to the bodies of others). Don’t let the lofty-sounding title of this bill fool you. It is a Trojan horse empowering organizers of sexual exploitation—pimps (i.e. sex traffickers) and brothel keepers—as well as serving the interests of sex buyers.

What the Bill Actually Does (More Details Here)

Decriminalizes “Pimping” – This bill would become lawful to engage in the sale of other human beings, or one’s self, for sex.

Decriminalizes Brothel Keeping – This bill would make the operation of brothels not only legal but entirely unregulated.

Decriminalizes Sex Buying – This bill would decriminalize “soliciting for prostitution” and would, therefore, decriminalize not only those who are sold for sex but also the sex buyers.

What You Can Do

  • Attend the upcoming DC Council Judiciary Committee hearing on this bill, scheduled to begin at 10:00 AM on Oct 17, at the WilsonBuilding (1350 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC) in room 412. Ask friends to join you.
  • Request to offer 5 minute testimony in opposition to the bill. Sign up to testify by emailing the Judiciary Committee at In your email, you must provide your name, telephone number, organizational affiliation, and title (if any) by the close of business on Monday, October 14th.
  • DC-based organizations and DC residents can sign on to this letter opposing the full decriminalization legislation


Why It Matters

Creates On-Ramps to Psychological Trauma

Prostitution is an organized system whereby human beings are provided and used as public sexual commodities. The sexual exploitation of individuals within this system is fueled by those who choose to buy other human beings for sex. This activity results in inescapable physical, psychological, and emotional trauma. Decriminalization of pimps, brothel-keeping, and sex buyers does not prevent the high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and other psychological and emotional harms associated with prostitution, but ensures such harms are perpetuated and multiplied. Decriminalization of pimping and sex buying creates major on-ramps to sexual exploitation by unleashing the demand for commercial sex.

Unleashes Demand

The demand for people to be used for sex is the reason prostitution and sex trafficking exist. Available evidence demonstrates this behavior as being almost entirely engaged in by males.[1] Once sex buying is decriminalized, it explodes, because men who don’t buy sex when it is illegal fearing potential criminal consequences become new consumers when legal barriers are removed. As a 2018 study of 8,000 American men demonstrate, more than 20% of respondents who never bought sex would if it was decriminalized. In Germany, where prostitution and brothels have been legal since 2002, an estimated one million men buy sex each day. Berlin alone has more than 500 brothels.[2] Moreover, sex trafficking cases in Germany increased by 70% between the years 2005-2009 as a result of legalization.[3]

Empowers a Predatory System Exploiting the Vulnerable

To satisfy the demand, the sex trade must lure in vulnerable people, because there are never enough people “available” for prostitution. In a world where homeless persons, sexual abuse victims, foster care children, immigrant and indigenous women, refugees, persons of color, learning disabled, and transgender persons already suffer from lives of political, social, and economic marginalization, it is a travesty of justice to decriminalize those who take pleasure in and literally profit from their sexual exploitation. But full decriminalization of prostitution assents to the sexual exploitation and trafficking of marginalized persons, often based on the false belief that systems of prostitution can be “fixed,” or the dystopian view that prostitution is a “social security” substitute for the poor and disenfranchised. No one should ever be expected to allow men access to their bodily orifices—mouth, vagina, and rectum—in order to obtain shelter, healthcare, social services or to feed themselves and their children.

The real objective of full decriminalization is an unregulated prostitution marketplace, where people can be sexually exploited with impunity.


Importantly, when NCOSE decries prostitution, we are condemning prostitution as a system whereby human beings are openly bought and sold for sex, not the persons used and exploited by that system.

[1] Demand Abolition, Who Buys Sex? Understanding and Disrupting Illicit Market Demand, (November 2018), (accessed October 2, 2019).

[2] Brad Tuttle, “Germany has Become the Cut-rate Prostitution Capital of the World,” Time (June 18, 2013),, (accessed October 2, 2019).

[3] European Women’s Lobby, “The Effects of Different Legislative Approaches to Prostitution on Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation,” n.d., (accessed October 2, 2019).

Intersectionality of Prostitution with Sexual Violence and Vulnerabilities

Studies characterize the violence that animates prostitution as brutal,[i] extreme,[ii] common,[iii] startling,[iv] normative,[v] and ever-present.[vi] Indeed, physical and sexual violence across prostitution types is pervasive—whether one is prostituting in Dallas, Texas,[vii] or Lyon County, Nevada,[viii] indoors or outdoors, online,[ix] for drugs or to pay the rent—both the threat of, as well as actual violence, permeate the everyday experience of prostitution.[x] Prostitution is so intertwined with exploitation, harm, and trauma, it can never be viewed as a conventional “business.”[xi] There is no such thing as “safe” prostitution.

In a world where so many homeless persons, sexual abuse victims, foster care children, immigrant and indigenous women, refugees, persons of color, learning disabled, and transgender persons already suffer from lives of political, social, and economic marginalization, it is a travesty of justice to decriminalize those who take pleasure in and literally profit from their sexual exploitation. But this is exactly what legalization and full decriminalization of prostitution does—it assents to the sexual exploitation and trafficking of marginalized persons, often based on the false belief that systems of prostitution can be “fixed” by legalization or full decriminalization, or the dystopian view that prostitution is a “social security” substitute for the poor and disenfranchised.

Yet, no amount of regulation can prevent the high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and other psychological and emotional harms associated with prostitution. And, no one should ever be expected to give men access to their bodily orifices—mouth, vagina, and rectum—in order to obtain shelter, healthcare, social services or to feed themselves and their children.

We Stand for the Abolition of Sexual Exploitation

This is why we stand for abolition—legal approaches to prostitution which seek to eradicate male sexual entitlement to the bodies of others through strong penalties, and which provide robust social services to those caught up in organized systems of sexual exploitation to support their exit from the sex trade. For strong policy recommendations that advance these goals, we recommend to you the report by Demand Abolition entitled Who Buys Sex? Understanding and Disrupting Illicit Market Demand.[xii]

Its recommendations are:

  1. Move law enforcement’s finite resources away from arresting and adjudicating prostituted persons and towards arresting and adjudicating buyers.
  2. Make available short-term federal funding programs to support state and local agencies ready to instigate reforms.
  3. Use mandatory minimum fines from convicted buyers to offset the costs of survivor exit services and law enforcement operations to stop demand.
  4. Create increasingly severe penalty structures for repeat buyers, ensuring that sanctions are fair and consistent with survivor testimony of the nature of victim impact.
  5. Counter messages that normalize sex buying through educational and public health interventions.
  6. Establish employer policies prohibiting sex buying under any circumstances, including activities on company time or with company resources that are related to sex buying.
  7. Implement targeted prevention campaigns and focus deterrence communications on behavioral “nudges.”

Watch Videos and Others in the Expert Commentary Section Below


[i] Celia Williamson and Gail Folaron, “Violence, Risk, and Survival Strategies of Street Prostitution,” Western Journal of Nursing Research 23, no. 5 (2001): 463-475; Jody Miller and Martin Schwartz, “Rape Myths and Violence against Street Prostitutes,” Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16 (1995): 1–23.

[ii] Melissa Farley, Jacqueline Lynne, and Ann Cotton, “Prostitution in Vancouver: Violence and the Colonization of First Nations Women,” Transcultural Psychiatry 42, no. 2, (2005): 242–271; Jody Raphael and Deborah L. Shapiro, “Sisters Speak Out: The Lives and Needs of Prostituted Women in Chicago, A Research Study,” (Center for Impact Research, Chicago, Illinois, 2002).

[iii] Melissa Farley, “Prostitution, Trafficking, and Cultural Amnesia: What We Must Not Know in Order To Keep the Business of Sexual Exploitation Running Smoothly,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 18, (2006): 101–136; Celia Williamson and Gail Folaron, “Violence, Risk, and Survival Strategies of Street Prostitution,” Western Journal of Nursing Research 23, no. 5 (2001): 463–475.

[iv] Kendra Nixon, Leslie Tutty, Pamela Downe, Kelly Gorkoff, and Jane Ursel, “The Everyday Occurrence: Violence in the Lives of Girls Exploited through Prostitution,” Violence against Women 8, no. 9 (September 2002): 1016–1043.

[v] Farley, “Prostitution, Trafficking, and Cultural Amnesia,” ibid.

[vi] Geetha Suresh, L. Allen Furr, and Aylur Kailasom Srikrishnan, “An Assessment of the Mental Health of Street-based Sex Workers in Chennai, India, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 25, no. 2 (2009): 186-201; Jody Miller and Martin Schwartz, “Rape Myths and Violence against Street Prostitutes,” Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16 (1995): 1–23.

[vii] Tasha Tsiaperas and Claire Ballor, “Killer Who Burned His Backpage Date in ‘World’s Worst Attempt’ at Coverup Gets 60 Years in Prison,”, February 1, 2018, (accessed April 9, 2019).

[viii] Rebekah Charleston vs. State of Nevada, (February 2, 2019), (accessed April 9, 2019).

[ix] Legal Momentum and I am Jane Doe, “Backpage, Craigslist, Dating App – Murder List” February 2018,

[x] Lisa L. Thompson, “Prostituted and Sexually Trafficked Persons are Rape Victims, Too” SANE-SART Online + Clinical, (March 24, 2016), (April 9, 2019).

[xi] Demand Abolition, Who Buys Sex? Understanding and Disrupting Illicit Market Demand, (November 2018), (accessed March 31, 2019).

[xii] Ibid.


Download Booklet: Prostitution: "The Zone" of Raw Male Physical and Sexual Violence
Download Booklet: Prostitution: “The Zone” of Raw Male Physical and Sexual Violence

DOWNLOAD RESEARCH COMPILATION – Prostitution: “The Zone” of Raw Male Physical and Sexual Violence

  • Indicative of the violence inherent to prostitution, a manual providing health and safety tips for prostituting persons produced by the St. James Infirmary, a San Francisco based agency, instructs prostituting persons to:


  • “Be aware of exits and avoid letting your customer block access to those exits.
  • Be aware of where your client is at all times, as much as possible.
  • Shoes should come off easily or be appropriate for running.
  • Avoid necklaces, scarves, across-the-body shoulder bags or anything else that can be accidentally or intentionally tightened around your throat;
  • Approach the driver’s window, keeping enough distance to avoid being grabbed, assaulted with spit or spray paint, or pleasing ‘window shoppers.’
  • Study the customer, the car, and the door-lock system.
  • Circle car completely before entering so you’re clear on how many passengers are in the car—and take the license plate number or pretend to. If you can, text-message all license plates to a safe person.
  • Do not carry a weapon that can be taken away from you and used against you. If you are threatened or being attacked, use your voice. Make a lot of noise. Scream! Turn on the car lights. Hit the horn. Try to get the door open, attack and run. Attack soft areas, such as throat, eyes, Adam’s apple, nose, testicles. Kick shins, stamp on instep; poke with fingers, nails, keys, spray hairspray in his face. Do not let him restrain you; if you see rope, handcuffs or bindings, fight like hell!”[1]
  • Semi-structured interviews of 47 prostituted women (aged 18-36) conducted in three Canadian provinces revealed violence or threats of violence from pimps, intimate partners, sex buyers, others in the sex trade, members of the public, institutional social service providers, and police. Investigators did not ask questions specific to abuse and violence—the information emerged in response to questions such as, “How did you become involved in prostitution.” Investigators report that the amount of violence and abuse that emerged was “startling.”


  • 47% of the women reported that their intimate partners physically, sexually, verbally, and financially abused them;
  • 23% were coerced into prostitution by boyfriends;
  • 2% of these women also reported being assaulted, sexually assaulted, or propositioned by a police officer.
  • More than 50% of the women reported experiencing violence from sexual buyers, including being: stabbed or cut, raped, gang-raped, raped at gunpoint, forced to engage in degrading sexual acts, choked/strangled, beaten, kidnapped, stalked, held with a gun to head, tied up, tortured, beaten with objects (e.g. baseball bat, crowbar), and run over.
  • One woman stated, “I figure I probably should have been dead at least 10 times.”[2]


  • In Karnataka, India, 3,852 females in prostitution participated in an integrated behavioral-biological assessment survey (IBBAs) in 4 different districts, and 7,638 prostituting females participated in 691 polling booth surveys (PBS). These surveys found that 11% of the prostituted females surveyed in the IBBAs and 26.4% in the PBS reported having been beaten or raped in the past year. Participants in the IBBAs reported that the main perpetrators of violence were: clients (56.2%), regular partners (22.8%), ‘rowdies’ (6.9%), the police (6.6%) and pimps (3.0%). Those who were raped were more likely to be younger, be non-local to the area, and have more than 10 clients per week. Higher rates of violence and rape were connected to non-condom use, as well as higher incidents of anal sex and gonorrhea infection.[3]
  • A study of 222 prostituted women (aged 18-59) in Chicago, who were currently in prostitution or had been within the past five years, reported violence across seven common prostitution activities (escort, exotic dancing, prostitution from one’s own residence, street, hotels, drug house, and survival sex). Violence was reported by the women in all prostitution venues. The 12 most common forms of violence included: slapping; punching; hair pulling; pinching; spanking; kicking; ripping clothes; throwing something; threats with weapons; threats of rape; inserting fingers/objects; and rape.


  • 80% of women in street prostitution had been threatened with a weapon at least once,
  • 4% were rape; 55.4% were threatened with rape;
  • 50% of women in escort prostitution had been raped, and 39.9% were threatened with either a weapon or rape;
  • 21% of women engaging in prostitution in their residence had been raped 10 or more times;
  • Sex buyers were responsible for 62-100% of violence against women in street-based prostitution;
  • Sexual buyers were responsible for 30-100% of violence against women in exotic dancing;
  • Perpetrators of violence were most commonly sex buyers, intimate partners, neighbors, and least commonly police.[4]
  • Of the 43 prostituted women interviewed in the study, 72.1% reported severe abuse at the hands of pimps, male sexual buyers, or boyfriends. The acts of abuse include being: raped, beaten with objects, threatened with weapons, and abandoned in remote locations.[5]
  • A comparative study of 46 formerly prostituted females (indoor prostitution only) and a control group (CG) of 31 age and education matched South Korean women found that of the prostituted women:
    • 3% experienced serious economic crisis including homelessness/CG 9.7%;
    • 6% were kept under surveillance or in captivity/CG 3.2%;
    • 7% were threatened with harm against those close to her or herself/CG 9.7%;
    • 2% had their daily activities such as eating, sleeping, and using toilets were controlled/CG 0%;
    • 3% physical appearance, body weight, and clothing controlled/CG 0%;
    • 6% experienced unexpected/ uncontrollable sexual/ physical attack/CG 6.5%;
    • 3% were emotionally abuse, shamed, neglected, and spoken ill of/CG 3.2%.[6]
  • In-depth interviews with 16 women (aged 20-38) incarcerated for prostitution-related offenses or on other charges but known to engage in prostitution, in a Midwestern county jail in the U.S., revealed that:


  • 8% had experienced some sort of sexual assault;
  • 75% had been raped by one or more sex buyer;
  • 6% raped in another context on the streets;
  • 5% had been kidnapped and held captive;
  • 2% had been beaten;
  • 3% punched or kicked;
  • 3% stabbed or slashed;
  • 25% hit with an object like a bat or brick
  • 1 woman had been tortured with electric shock.

The authors observed that, “Once a prostitute has consented to any exchange of sex for money, these women see many men as assuming that she has given up the right to refuse consent in any situation. Once her sexuality has been ‘purchased,’ her body ‘belongs’ to the purchaser to use. This was the constant theme in the interviews. Many women encountered men who treated their agreement to engage in some form of sex as permission to abuse the women’s bodies in any way they wished, as long as they gave the women monetary compensation (p 11-12).”[7]


  • An investigation into the morality rate of women in prostitution revealed that the leading cause of death was homicide (19%) and found that actively prostituting women were nearly 18 times more likely to be murdered that women of similar age and race during the study interval. The homicide rate for women in prostitution of 204 per 100,000, was many times higher than that for women and men in occupations with the highest workplace homicide rates in the U.S. in the 1980s: 4 per 100,000 for female liquor store worker and 29 per 100,000 for male taxi cab drivers.[8]


  • In a Midwestern city in the U.S., 13 women (aged 18-40 years old) who were engaged in street prostitution participated in a survey on violence, risk, and survival strategies. Twelve (92.3%) of the women reported sex buyer-related violence. Violence was described as common, frequent, and pervasive.


  • 3% slapped, punched, kicked, hit;
  • 5% choked, beaten;
  • 5% raped or repeated attempted rape;
  • 5% assaulted and robbed;
  • 4% tortured with perversion;*
  • 8% pushed out of moving vehicle;
  • 1% tied up against will;
  • 1% beaten with blunt object;
  • 4% kidnapped and held hostage;
  • 4% stabbed repeatedly;
  • 4% crashed through glass
  • *Torture with perversion included being stuffed into a trunk, having a knife inserted into the vagina, being forced to sit on a gear shift anally, being burnt on the chest as a brand, and being severely bitten on the vagina and nipples.[9]


  • A study of 854 individuals (women, girls, and transgendered people) currently or recently in prostitution in nine countries (Canada, Colombia, Germany, Mexico, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, United States, and Zambia), investigated their lifetime history of sexual and physical violence. Some of those interviewed had been trafficked for the purpose of prostitution and were engaged in legal prostitution. Types and amount of violence experienced in prostitution are as follows:


  • 71% physically assaulted;
  • 57% raped; of those raped, 59% were raped more than 5 times;
  • 64% threatened with a weapon;
  • 88% verbal abuse;
  • 49% had pornography made of them;
  • 47% were upset by attempts to coerce them perform something a sex buyer had seen in pornography;
  • In Germany, where prostitution is legal, 59% responded that prostitution is not safer with legalization;
  • 89% wanted to exit prostitution.
  • Equating prostitution with death, one woman stated, “Why commit suicide? I’ll work in prostitution instead (p. 53).”[10]


  • One hundred street-based prostituted women and children were interviewed in Vancouver, B.C. regarding their experience of violence in prostitution. The study found that 52% of those interviewed were Canada’s First Nations (Native Indians) persons, whereas the general populace of Vancouver is only 1.7-7% First Nations. Respondents reported a history of prostituting in multiple venues, including: escort, massage, and street-level prostitution. Types and amounts of violence experienced while in prostitution included:


  • 90% physically assaulted; 82% of assaults were perpetrated by sex buyers;
  • 88% verbal abuse;
  • 67% threatened with a weapon;
  • 78% raped; of those raped, 67% were raped more than 5 times;
  • Of those raped 76% were raped by sex buyers;
  • 67% had pornography made of them while in prostitution;
  • 64% upset by attempts to force them to perform something a sex buyer had seen in pornography;
  • 95% wanted to exit prostitution;
  • One woman reported: “What rape is to others, is normal to us (p. 254).”[11]


  • Violence perpetrated by sex buyers within the last year was reported by 36% of 278 women (aged 18-49) surveyed in street-based prostitution in Miami. Forms of violence most commonly reported were being ripped off, beaten, threatened with a weapon, or raped by a sex buyer. The level of violence experienced within the past three months jumped to 71.2% when boyfriends, drug dealers, other street people, relatives, and police were included as perpetrators.[12]


  • Of 294 prostituting women (aged 18 and above) interviewed in Miami, FL, it was reported that 75.5% had been victimized by someone during the previous 90 days (data not shown), and that 51.7% had experienced physical violence from sexual buyers in the last year.


Last 30 Days               Last Year

  • Cornered                                           1%                       42.9%
  • Ripped off                                        0%                       32.0%
  • Escaped from violent date            3%                       28.2%
  • Beaten                                               2%                       25.5%
  • Threatened with a weapon           6.1%                      6%
  • Raped/gang-raped                         4%                       13.9%
  • Shot at/cut                                       1%                        7.5%
  • Victimized by any means              6%    51.7%[13]
  • Sixty-seven percent of 57 women involved in street prostitution in Chennai, India, reported experiencing one or more episode of violence, including being hit, kicked, burned, raped, gang raped, and involuntarily restrained while prostituting. These acts were perpetrated by sexual buyers, pimps, madams, and police. Ninety-five percent of the women reported neglect by their husband, lack of support from husband, death of a husband, violence by husband, or alcohol- or drug-addicted husband.[14]


  • A study of 106 women involved in street-based prostitution conducted in New York City reported types and amounts of violence experience while in prostitution included:


  • Abuse by intimate partner (45) Lifetime           In the past year
    • Physical abuse                          8%                    20.0%
    • Sexual abuse                              2%                    8.9%
    • Physical and sexual abuse      3%                    22.2%
  • Abuse by sexual buyers (106)
    • Physical abuse                            3%                   23.6%
    • Sexual abuse                               9%                  20.8%
    • Physical and sexual abuse       0%                  32.1%[15]
  • A study in San Francisco interviewed 130 prostituting persons (women, men, and transgender men, aged 14-61) regarding violence in their lives and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Types and amounts of violence experienced while in prostitution included:


  • 82% physically assaulted; 55% of physical assaults were perpetrated by sex buyers;
  • 80% of physical attacks by pimps and sex buyers resulted in serious injuries;
  • 83% threatened with a weapon;
  • 68% were raped; 48% were raped 5 or more times;
  • Of those raped, 46% were raped by sex buyers;
  • 49% had pornography made of them while in prostitution;
  • 32% were upset by attempts to make them act out pornography;
  • 88% wanted to leave prostitution.[16]
  • Of 303 prostituted females (aged 15 and above) interviewed in New Zealand, 58% reported that they felt pressure to accept a client when they did not want to (53% street-based; 59% indoor-based). Females in street-based prostituted refused sex buyers more often than indoor-based women (85% compared to 55%). One or more violent events were reported by 83% of those surveyed. Types and amounts of violence included:


  • Street-based:
    • 54% – refusal to pay (after provision of sex act)
    • 42% – money stolen by sex buyer
    • 41% – physically assaulted
    • 65% – threatened with physical violence
    • 23% – held somewhere against their will
    • 82% – verbal abuse
    • 27% – raped
    • 21% – forced to have unprotected sex


  • Indoor-based:
    • 46% – refusal to pay (after provision of sex act)
    • 25% – money stolen by sex buyer
    • 21% – physically assaulted
    • 26% – threatened with physical violence
    • 13% – held somewhere against their will
    • 52% – verbal abuse
    • 8% – raped
    • 9% – forced to have unprotected sex.[17]
  • A comparative study of prostituting females from three U.K. cities reported that the violence ratio between outdoor and indoor prostitution was 81% to 48%. Fifty percent of street prostituted women and 26% of indoor prostituted women reported violence by clients in the last six months, and only 34% of women reported violence to the police (44% of street and 18% of indoor prostituted women).


  • Outdoor:


  • 47% slapped, kicked or punched;
  • 39% threatened with physical violence;
  • 37% robbed;
  • 27% beaten;
  • 24% threatened with weapon;
  • 25% held against their will;
  • 20% strangulation;
  • 20% kidnapped;
  • 28% attempted rape;
  • 22% raped vaginally;
  • 5% raped anally.


  • Indoor prostitution:


  • 14% slapped, kicked or punched;
  • 14 % threatened with physical violence;
  • 10% were robbed;
  • 1% were beaten;
  • 8% threatened with weapon;
  • 15% held against their will;
  • 6% strangulation;
  • 2% kidnapped;
  • 17% attempted rape;
  • 2% raped vaginally;
  • 6% raped anally.[18]


  • Women and children can be controlled in indoor prostitution in ways they cannot on the street. Indoor prostituted women can be locked in their rooms, heavily drugged, restrained, beaten, and remain invisible trafficking victims.[19]


  • Of 200 prostituting women in Tamil Nadu, India, more than 95% reported experiences of violence. The forms of violence experienced include beatings, acid attacks, stabbing or cutting with knives, breaking arms or legs, sexual harassment, rape, hitting with hard objects, throwing stones, shaving heads, putting chili powder in the eyes, beating the soles of feet and then forcing them to jump up and down, and murder.[20]


  • A study of 325 actively prostituting females, in Miami, Florida, reported types and amounts of violence in prostitution in the last 12 months that included:


  • 5% violent sex buyer;
  • 9% robbed;
  • 9% beaten;
  • 8% threatened with a weapon;
  • 9% raped;
  • Drug-using women in street prostitution experienced 43 times higher rates of rape and 13 times higher rates of physical assault than the national average of women.[21]


  • A study of 72 females involved in street-based prostitution in Sydney, Australia, found that violence while prostituting was experienced by 85% of the women, and only 35% of these incidents were reported to the police. The types and amounts of violence included:


  • 65% physical assault;
  • 40% were rape at gun/knife point;
  • 33% were raped without a weapon;
  • 44% were raped in their personal lives;
  • 29% robbed;
  • 21% attempted rape;
  • 13% were threatened/attacked with a weapon;
  • 71% witnessed serious injury to or death of another person (while in prostitution or in personal lives).[22]


  • In a comparative study sex buyers were more likely than non sex buyers to express a preference for impersonal sex, had greater hostile masculinity, greater self-reported likelihood of raping, and a greater history of sexual aggression.[23]


  • 54% of murders of women in prostitution were perpetrated by strangers (54%), compared to only 6.8% of female, nonsexual murder victims.[24]


  • In Antwerp, Belgium, a brothel operator installed biometric scanners in his state-of-the-art 51-roomed brothel; the scanners insure that only legally registered prostituting women use the rooms. Each room is also equipped with a panic button next to the bed, which when pushed calls police and sets off a red flashing light in the brothel’s control room. Ironically this brought comfort to one prostituted woman who said, “In the old days I worked in a place where you were lucky if the electricity worked and I feared for my life . . . . If something should happen to me and I turn up dead tomorrow—the technology here means that police will know exactly who I am.”[25]


  • Among a study of 32 formerly prostituted women (aged 19-45) interviewed for a study in Vancouver, British Columbia, some reported violence in massage parlors in which the sexual buyers would assault them and the owners told them to endure it. Some reported abuse from the owners themselves, including being pushed down a flight of stairs


The same study found that in pimp-controlled prostitution, that pimps beat “their” women regularly, often without any precipitating factors, to show them who was in control and to inculcate fear of attempting to exit the trade. Some beatings involved utilization of a pimp stick—a coat hanger that has been unraveled and doubled over; occasionally the pimp stick is heated on a stove to increase the degree of pain. One interviewee reported being unable to look at wire coat hangers and having to stock her house only with plastic hangers, even years after exiting the industry.[26]


  • Two hundred females formerly and currently involved in street prostitution in the San Francisco area, 73% reported 193 cases of rape. Allusions to pornographic material on the part of the rapist were made in 24% of the cases of rape reported. Respondents provided this information without any solicitation from or reference to pornography on the part of the interviewer. The consistent pattern that emerged revealed that assailants referred to pornographic materials he had seen or read and then insisted that the victims not only enjoyed the rape but also the extreme violence.[27]



  • A study conducted of 50 women (aged 19-46) incarcerated for prostitution in a large, northeastern American city found that:


  • 58% were verbally abused by a sex buyer;
  • 36% were hit;
  • 30% were robbed or had a weapon used against them;
  • 32% have had a sex buyer attempt to rape them;
  • 26% were raped;
  • 53% were regularly beaten by pimps.
  • One woman continued to prostitute despite a knife wound from a deranged street person. Her next sex buyer was concerned, not with the fact that she was injured, but with the possibility that her bleeding would damage his upholstery.
  • The women unanimously stated that they would not recommend street prostitution to other women. [28]
  • A study of 1000 prostituting females (aged 16-40), found that younger females were more likely to report rape (8.2%) within the last month, compared to 3% of older prostitution females.[29]


  • A Canadian commission found that the death rate of women in prostitution due to violence and drug overdose may be 40 times higher than that of the general public.[30]
  • Interviews of 100 individuals (females (42%), males (32%), and transgender males (26%)) involved in street-based prostitution in inner city Washington, D.C., found high incidents of violence. Since entering prostitution, 61% reported being physically assaulted, with the majority being perpetrated by sexual buyers (75%). The violence in prostitution was reported as follows:


Female        Male     Transgender          Sample

n=42           n=32               n=26                   n=100


Physically assaulted             85.7%           28.1%             65.4%                 61.0%

Customer                    80.6%           62.5%            70.6%                 75.4%

Someone Else             13.9%           37.5%            29.4%                 21.3%

Pimp                             5.6%               0.0%             0.0%                 3.3%


Threatened                            90.5%           84.4%            88.0%                 87.9%


Threatened with a weapon  73.8%         78.1%             88.0%                 78.8%


Raped in prostitution           73.8%         12.5%             34.6%                 44.0%


Times rape in prostitution

Once                            22.6%         75.0%             66.7%                36.4%

2-5                               61.3%         25.0%             22.2%                 50.0%

6-10                             6.5%            0.0%           11.1%                 6.8%

11-19                           3.2%             0.0%              0.0%                 2.3%

Over 20                       6.5%             0.0%              0.0%                 4.5%


Who raped you?

Customer                    71.9%          0.0%             60.0%                 60.0%

Someone Else              34.3%         100.0%            40.0%                 58.0%

Pimp                           3.1%              0.0%            20.0%                  4.0%

Upset when asked to do

something seen in a             26.2%         53.1%            30.8%                 36.0%

pornographic video


Hurt with words                    52.4%         37.5%            57.7%                 49.0%


Safer if prostitution legal   42.9%         62.5%            50.0%                 50.0%


Wanted to exit prostitution 67%              91.0%            73.0%                 76.2%[31]

  • The 31 females (77%) and transvestites (23%) in prostitution (street-based (80%) and indoor (20%)) in Belgrade and Pancevo, Serbia, reported using a sex buyers sorting strategy to reduce risk to avoid the “messy,” “dirty,” and “dangerous,” in favor of the “married,” “normal,” and “clean.” All individuals reported experiencing violence linked to their prostitution involvement. One prostituting transvestite stated, “I find it very difficult to get into someone’s car . . . because life is at stake.”[32]


  • Women in prostitution are a target group for serial offenders, such as:
    • Arthur Shawcross (New York), “Genesee River Killer,” who between 1988 and 1990 killed 11 women in prostitution;
    • William Lester Suff (California), “Riverside Prostitute Killer,” was convicted of 12 murders of women in prostitution and was suspected of committing 10 others (Mendoza, 2002);
    • Saeed Hanaei (Iran), confessed to strangling 16 of the 19 prostituting women who had been murdered in Mashad in 2001;
    • Gary Ridgway (Washington) the “Green River Killer” pleaded guilty to the murders of 48 women from 1982 to 1998, most of whom were involved in prostitution.[33]
    • Robert Pickton, convicted of murdering 6 women (20 additional counts were stayed) and who is suspected of murdering more than 30 women.[34] Most of his victims were involved in prostitution.[35]


  • A study of 18 women involved in stripping in the Midwestern U.S. found that male sex buyers, managers, staff and owners used diverse methods of harassment, manipulation, exploitation, and abuse to control the women. Types and amounts of abuse experienced by the women included:


  • 100% physical abuse on an average of 7.7 times;
  • 100% sexual abuse on an average of 4.4 times;
  • 100% verbal abuse on an average of 4.8 times;
  • 100% propositioned for prostitution (78% propositioned every day);
  • 78% stalked by a person associated with the club;
  • 61% attempted sexual assault by a person associated with the club;
  • 100% of the women witnessed violence in the club, of which it was reported that there were no consequences for the male perpetrators.


The abuses suffered by the women, included:


  • Grabbed by breasts, buttocks, and genitals;
  • Licked and pinched;
  • Costume pulled off;
  • Coins thrown at her;
  • Garbage thrown at her;
  • Men exposing their penises;
  • Men masturbating in front of;
  • Penetrated vaginally and anally with fingers and objects;
  • Forced to masturbate a man;
  • Rape;
  • Followed to her car;
  • Followed home;
  • Followed in her private time;
  • Sent letters, given gifts, and called against their wishes;
  • Sexually abused and exploited by owners as a condition of work
  • Called cunt, slut, whore, pussy, bitch, and more. [36]
    • Thirty-five women (aged 23-41) involved street prostitution participated in a study conducted in inner city Hartford, Connecticut. Researchers found that:
    • 90% experienced violence from sex buyers;
    • 60% had been raped while in prostitution;
    • 75% reported physical abuse by husbands and boyfriends;
    • 7% were victims of incidents in which they were nearly killed by sex buyers;
    • 25% had friends who were murdered while in prostitution;
    • The women witnessed daily occurrences of violence directly related to the protection of drug territories, settlement of drugs debts, and concurrent violence that influenced their lives.
    • One woman stated, “I don’t want to have to go out and keep selling my body like this anymore. It’s degrading. . .I’m afraid If I keep doing this that I’m going to get to a point so low that I won’t want to bring myself back. . .It’s very degrading, it makes you feel like you’re nothing.”[37]


  • S. Army Field Manual No. 2-22.3 expressly bans U.S. military personnel from perpetrating acts of torture including forcing an individual to perform or simulate sexual acts or to pose in a sexual manner, as well as exposing an individual to outrageously lewd and sexually provocative behavior in any context. It also prohibits forcing the detainee to be naked, perform sexual acts, or pose in a sexual manner in interrogations. Any single act of such sexual abuse is a violation of the code. Yet, such acts—serially committed—are the quintessence of what pimps do. Thus, in respect to the sexual abuse that they perpetrate or orchestrate on behalf of sex buyers all pimps can be said to be torturers.[38]


  • “At the 15th International AIDS conference in Bangkok (July 2004), several sex worker groups presented information about the occupational health and safety of prostitutes. Members of Bangkok organization EMPOWER instructed women in bar prostitution (one type of indoor prostitution) how to insert and pull out razor blades from their vaginas. This is understood to be a job requirement in the bar-show setting where tricks are sexually exited by the possibility of genital mutilation of Thai women.”[39]


  • A sex-shop owner who also rented rooms to prostituting women in Amsterdam, lamented the government’s requirement of a pillow in rooms where sex is sold saying, “You don’t want a pillow in your room. It’s a murder weapon.”[40]


  • A woman in prostitution woman stated, “You just give them what they want and pray they don’t kill you.”[41]


  • The perception of persons in prostitution as disposable people was captured in this statement from a sex buyer, “For me, being with a prostitute is not a relationship. It’s like having a cup of coffee, when you’re done, you throw it out.”[42]


[1]Akers, N. & Evans. C. (2004). Occupational health and safety handbook (3rd ed.). St. James Infirmary.

[2] Nixon, K., Tutty, L., Downe, P., Gorkoff, K., & Ursel, J. (2002, September). The everyday occurrence: Violence in the lives of girls exploited through prostitution. Violence Against Women, 8(9), 1016-1043.

[3] Beattie, T., Bharracharjee, P., Ramesh, BM., Gurnani, V., Anthony, J., Isac, S., et al. (2010). Violence against female sex workers in Karnataka state, south India: Impact on health, and reductions in violence following an intervention program. BMC Public Health, 10(476).

[4] Raphael, J. and Shapiro, D. (2002, August). Sisters speak out: The lives and needs of prostituted women in

Chicago. Center for Impact Research, 1-35.

[5] Dalla, R. (2000, November). Exposing the “pretty woman” myth: A qualitative examination of the lives of female streetwalking prostitutes. The Journal of Sex Research, 37(4), 344-353.

[6] Choi, H., Klein, C., Shin, M. & Lee, H. (2009, August). Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and disorders of extreme stress (DESNOS) symptoms following prostitution and childhood abuse. (2009). Violence Against Women, 15(8), 933-951.

[7] Miller, J., & Schwartz, M. (1995). Rape myths and violence against street prostitutes. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1), 1-23.

[8] Potterat, J., Brewer, D., Muth, S., Rothenberg, R., Woodhouse, D., Muth, J. et al. (2004). Mortality in a long-term open cohort of prostitute women. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159(8), 778-785.

[9] Williamson, C. & Folaron, G. (2001). Violence, risk, and survival strategies of street prostitution.

Western Journal of Nursing Research, 23(5), 463-475.

[10] Farley, M., Cotton, A. et al. (2003). Prostitution and Trafficking in Nine Countries: An Update on

Violence and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Journal of Trauma Practice, 2(3/4), 33-74.

[11] Farley, M., Lynne, J. and Cotton, A. (2005). Prostitution in Vancouver: Violence and the colonization of First Nations women. Transcultural Psychiatry, 42(2), 242-271.

[12] Surratt, H., Kurtz, S., Weaver, J. & Inciardi, J. (2005). The Connections of Mental Health Problems, Violent Life

Experiences, and the Social Milieu of the “Stroll” with the HIV Risk Behaviors of Female Street Sex Workers. Contemporary Research on Sex Work, 23-44.

[13] Kurtz., S., Surratt, H., Inciardi, J., & Kiley, M. (2004, April). Sex work and “date” violence. Violence Against Women, 10(4), 357-385.

[14] Suresh, G., Furr, L., & Srikrishnan, Aylur, et al. (2009). An assessment of the mental health of street-based sex workers in Chennai, India. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25(2), 186-201.

[15] El-Bassel, N., Witte, S., Wada, T., Gilbert, L. & Wallace, J. (2001). Correlates of partner violence among female street-based sex workers: Substance abuse, history of childhood abuse, and HIV risks. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 15(1), 41-51.

[16] Farley, M. and Barkan, H. (1998). Prostitution, Violence Against Women, and Posttraumatic Stress

Disorder. Women & Health, 27(3), 37-49.

[17] Plumridge, L., & Abel, G. (2001, February). A ‘segmented’ sex industry in New Zealand: Sexual and personal safety of female sex workers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(1), 78-83.

[18] Church, S., Henderson, M., Barnard, M., & Hart, G. (2001). Violence by clients towards female prostitutes in different work settings: questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 322(7285), 524-525.

[19] Farley, M. (2005). Prostitution harms women even if indoors: Reply to Weitzer. Violence Against Women, 11(7), 950-964.

[20] Jayasree, AK. (2004). Searching for justice for body and self in a coercive environment: Sex work in Kerala, India. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(23), 58-67.

[21] Surratt, H., Inciardi, J., Kurtz, S., & Kiley, M. (2004, January). Sex work and drug use in a subculture of violence. Crime & delinquency, 50(1), 43-59.

[22] Roxburgh, A., Degenhardt, L. & Copeland, J. (2006, May). Posttraumatic stress disorder among female

street-based sex workers in the greater Sydney area, Australia. BMC Psychiatry, 6(24), 1-12.

[23] Farley, M., Golding, J., Matthews, E., Malamuth, N., & Jarrett, L. (2015, August). Comparing sex buyers with men who do not buy sex: New data on prostitution and trafficking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

[24] Salfati, C. G., James, A., and Ferguson, L. (2008). Prostitute Homicides: A Descriptive Study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(4), 505-543.

[25] Bilefsky, D. (2005, May 26). Belgian experiment: Make prostitution legal to fight its ills. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.

[26] Kennedy, M., Klein, C., Bristowe, J., Cooper, B., & Yuille, J. (2007). Routes of recruitment: Pimp’s techniques and other circumstances that lead to street prostitution. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15(2), 1-19.

[27] Silbert, M., & Pines, A. (1984). Pornography and sexual abuse of women. Sex Roles, 10(11/12), 857-868.

[28] Norton-Hawk, M.A. (2001) The Counter-productivity of Incarcerating Female Street Prostitutes. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 403-417.

[29] Pettifor, A., Turner, A., Van Damme, K., Hatzell-Hoke, T., Rasamindrakotroka, A., et al. (2007). Increased Risk of Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infection in Adolescent Sex Workers in Madagascar. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34(7), 475-478.

[30] Special Committee on Pornography and Prostitution. (1985). Pornography and prostitution in Canada, (Vol. 2), 350.

[31] Valera, R., Sawyer, R. & Schiraldi, G. (2001). Perceived Health Needs of Inner-City Street

Prostitutes: A Preliminary Study. American Journal Health Behavior, 25(1), 50-59.

[32] Rhodes, T., Simic, M., Baros, S., Platt, L., & Zikic, B. (2008). Police violence and sexual risk among female and transvestite sex workers in Serbia: Qualitative study. BMJ, 337, 1-8.

[33] Salfati, C., James, A., & Ferguson, L. (2008). Prostitute homicides: A descriptive study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(4), 505-543.

[34] MacQueen, K. (2010, August 13). How serial killer Robert Pickton slipped away. New revelations show why he was able to prey with such impunity. MacLean’s. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from

[35] Farmer ‘skinned victim on meat hook.’ (2007, Jan 26). The Guardian. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from

[36] Holsopple, K. (1997). Strip club testimony. The Freedom and Justice Center for Prostitution Resources: A Program of the Volunteers of America of Minnesota, 1-17.

[37]Romero-Daza, N., Weeks, M., & Singer, M. (2003). “Nobody gives a damn if I live or die”: Violence, drugs, and street-level prostitution in inner-city Hartford, Connecticut. Medical Anthropology, 22, 233-259.

[38] Thompson, L. (2011). On a street corner near you: Pimps as practioners of torture. In R. Dalla, L. Baker, J. DeFrain, & C. Williamson (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Prostitution and Sex Trafficking. Europe, Latin America, North America, and Global (pp.291-313). Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.

[39] Farley, M. (2005, July). Prostitution harms women even if indoors: Reply to Weitzer. Violence Against Women, 11(7), 950-964.

[40] Daley, S. (2001, August 21). New rights for Dutch prostitutes, but no gain. The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2009, from Lexis Nexus.

[41] Dalla, R., Xia, Y., & Kennedy, H. (2003, November). “You just give them what they want and pray they don’t kill you.” Street-level sex workers’ reports of victimization, personal resources, and coping strategies. Violence Against Women, 9 (11), 1367-1394.

[42] Farley, M., Golding, J., Matthews, E., Malamuth, N., & Jarrett, L. (2015, August). Comparing sex buyers with men who do not buy sex: New data on prostitution and trafficking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

[43] Farley, M., Golding, J., Matthews, E., Malamuth, N., & Jarrett, L. (2015, August). Comparing sex buyers with men who do not buy sex: New data on prostitution and trafficking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Decriminalized prostitution refers to the removal of laws criminalizing the sex trade. One form of decriminalization—commonly referred to as the Nordic model—targets only individuals involved in the selling of sex (i.e. prostituting persons); other forms of decriminalization may seek to decriminalize all parties involved in the provisioning, buying, and selling of sex. Thus, “full” decriminalization refers to the repeal of laws pertaining to pimping, brothel keeping, and sex buyers, as well as those who sell sex.

Legalized prostitution is generally understood to be regulated prostitution, although the term may also be used to refer to jurisdictions where there is no law explicitly prohibiting prostitution. Under systems of legalized prostitution, various regulations governing how commercial sex transaction are to be conducted are instituted. Such regulations may include brothel licensing requirements and restrictions on where brothels can locate, as well as establish requirements that prostituting persons officially register with the government, undergo compulsory health checks, and pay taxes on proceeds from prostitution.

A third approach to prostitution is known as prohibition. According to this approach all prostitution is viewed as criminal activity and all activities connected with prostitution (i.e. soliciting, procuring, pimping, brothel keeping) are criminalized.

Across the United States, political efforts to normalize the commercial sex industry are popping up, often claiming to protect people in prostitution.

Pending before the District of Colombia’s city council, for example, is a bill with the Orwellian title Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019.

However, the reality is: There are no independent studies that show normalizing the sex trade by decriminalizing it or legalizing it makes it safer.

On the contrary, where prostitution is legalized/legitimized there’s an increase in sex trafficking, as demonstrated by an academic study of 150 countries led by the London School of Economics.

Why? For several logical reasons:

  1. Once you normalize the sex trade, it explodes.

In Germany, where prostitution and brothels have been legal since 2002, an estimated one million men buy sex each day, coming from all over the world.

The capital city, Berlin, alone has over 500 brothels.


  1. Men who don’t buy sex when it is illegal, become new clients.

As a 2018 study of 8,000 U.S. men demonstrates, over 20% of respondents who never bought sex, would consider engaging in exploitation  if it was decriminalized or legalized.


  1. To satisfy demand, the sex trade has to lure in vulnerable people, because there are never enough women willing to be exploited and degraded in prostitution

Sex trafficking cases increased 70% in Germany as a result of legalization.

In The Netherlands were prostitution was legalized in 2000, an estimated 50-90% of women are selling their bodies against their will.

The illegal sex trade increases alongside the legal sector, when it is normalized.

Nevada, the only U.S. jurisdiction with legal brothels, has the highest rates of an illegal sex trade—63% higher than the next highest state of New York and double that of Florida.

Prostitution is inherently dangerous and harmful. The only way to protect people is to shrink the market.

A 2018 study of prostituted women, including trans women, in the U.S. found 61% suffered Traumatic Brain Injuries while in “the Life.”

In a nine-country study of 785 prostituted women, 68% suffered PTSD at same severity as combat veterans and victims of state torture.

The mortality rate of women in prostitution is 200 times the rate of the general population, according to a Colorado medical study examining two decades of evidence.

In an academic survey of women, including trans women, in DC engaged in street prostitution, 42% met the criteria for PTSD, 61% percent reported being physically assaulted, nearly 80% reported being threatened with a weapon, and 44% had been raped in prostitution, with 60% of these rapes committed by sex buyers.

A 2013 study of 150 countries from the London School of Economics found that wherever prostitution was legal, sex-trafficking tended to increase, not decrease.

Further, the state of Nevada (the only state in the U.S. with legalized prostitution in select counties) has the highest rates of an illegal sex trade in the country, adjusted for population. It is 63% higher than the next highest state of New York and double that of California.

Why? Because once something is legal, there is an increased demand for it.

And because prostitution is inherently dangerous and harmful, there are not many women or men who enter into it “willingly.” This means that sex traffickers push victims into the sex trade through force, fraud, or coercion in order to make a profit off of the high demand for commercial sex.

It is essentially impossible for sex buyers to vet and know if the person they are purchasing for sex is a sex trafficking victim or not. Most sex trafficking victims are not held in dungeons with literal chains but are instead imprisoned through psychological coercion and threats, so that they can meet sex buyers at various locations.

The debate about choice in prostitution is always focused on those with the least power and control in the whole equation: the prostituting person. It’s time to discuss the choices of those with the real power—sex buyers, pimps, corporate interests, and governments—and hold them accountable for their choices to promote and participate in sexploitation.


If for nothing else, America is known for the bonanza of choices it presents to those living within its borders, and the freedom it extends to those individuals to pursue them. From the trivial, like what kind of milk (i.e. skim, 1%, 2%, whole, dairy, almond, soy, and a wide assortment of blends) and coffee we drink (ice mocha latte with a shot of espresso, anyone?), to the serious, like the occupations we pursue and those we elect—and everything in between—America affords its residents a cornucopia of choices. Indeed, choice and freedom are viewed by many as part of the American birthright.


In this context, supreme value is placed on the ability to choose, but not on what is chosen. As long as a perception of the freedom to choose exists, most people are happy to let others pursue whatever course they will. However, this “it’s your choice” approach to life, is not without its downsides. Just ask any recently divorced person who was traded in for someone younger and hotter how they feel about their ex-spouse’s choice to move on. Or consider the lives being lost because of the new wingsuiting craze that has motivated people to jump off mountains to experience “flying” but who tragically plummeted to their deaths. Clearly, then, not all choices are created equal.


This is especially true of prostitution. But, ask anyone involved in advocacy efforts or providing social services on behalf of prostituted persons, and they will tell you about the all-too-familiar, pro-prostitution, trump card otherwise known as “the choice argument.” It usually goes down like this: whenever a debate about prostitution arises, pro-prostitution advocates play their “choice card” by raising an argument which asserts that as long as prostitution is chosen, it no longer constitutes exploitation. Any harms that result are just the cost of poor decision making and the full responsibility of the person making the choice. The intended result is to shut down any arguments about the harms, the violence, the inequality, and dehumanization that are all part and parcel of prostitution. After all, to be anti-choice is to be anti-freedom, a proponent of oppression, and an unreasonable puritan, right? Without doubt it’s been a powerful tactic, but let’s examine the claim more carefully.


According to this view, no matter how injurious, dangerous, or pernicious the choice to prostitute may be, we must simply sit back and accept prostitution as a fact of life—as long as it is chosen. But as author and women’s advocate Rebecca Whisnant explains, “That something is chosen or consensual is perfectly consistent with its being seriously oppressive, abusive, and harmful—to oneself and/or to a broader group of which one is a member (e.g. women).” We wholeheartedly agree.


There are lots of choices one can make: to jaywalk, eat foods loaded with trans fat, drive above the speed limit, not wear a helmet while riding a motorbike, smoke, handle a loaded gun, or go wingsuiting in the Alps and many more. But as a civilized society we recognize that choices such as those listed above are potentially harmful to the individuals who engage in them, as well as others around them who don’t. In light of these dangers, society attempts to make rules, restrictions, and barriers on such activities, and in some cases even bans them. Why should it be any different for an activity as imbued with as much risk as prostitution?


To the extent that prostitution is ever truly a choice (for most of the people in it, it most decidedly is not), it’s a choice fraught with danger, and not just run-of-the-mill office place dangers (like slipping on wet floors), but physical and sexual violence that includes things like stabbings, rape, gang-rape, degrading sexual acts, choking/strangulation, beatings with fists or hard objects, kidnap, stalking, threat with a firearm, and torture—to mention a few. (For more on the physical and sexual violence native to prostitution, see our booklet Prostitution: “The Zone” of Raw Male Physical and Sexual Violence.)


Given this degree of potential harm, prostitution hardly seems like a choice that any caring society would sanction. But that’s exactly what happens when governments legalize or decriminalize prostitution—they choose to allow the vulnerable, the desperate, and the reckless to become the prey of the greedy, powerful, selfish, and lascivious. They choose to ensure that a pool of persons are always on supply as public, sexual property, disregarding the many lives that are offered up and the cost to individual bodies, minds, and spirits.


Ironically, the debate about choice in prostitution is always focused on those with the least power and control in the whole equation: the prostituting person. Those with the real power—sex buyers, pimps, corporate interests, and governments—are rarely, if ever, held accountable for their choices. Indeed, if sex buyers stopped choosing to buy sex today, the entire sex industry would disintegrate tomorrow.


Of course, no one is holding their breath waiting for that to happen. However, those who care about people in the sex trade can choose not to build a super highway to sexploitation by fully decriminalizing or legalizing prostitution, but to shrink the opportunities for pimps and sex buyers to operate by creating and enforcing tough penalties on their activities, and fostering pathways out of prostitution for those already in it. That’s the only choice that fosters dignity, wholeness, life and true freedom.

Argument #1: Prostitution is sex work.

Response: “Sexual exploitation is nobody’s ‘job.’”


Several years ago the advocacy group Women Hurt in Systems of Prostitution (WHISPER) developed a powerful tool that communicated the extent of the harms experienced by persons in prostitution. Just what was this tool? Answer: a “job” description.

Few things undermine the myth of “sex work” like a detailed list of exactly what people caught up in the sex trade are expected to do¾night after night, day after day, month after month, year after long, miserable, interminable year. For those readers of stout mind and heart, you can read that “job” description here. However, for those who are triggered by depictions of sexual abuse and violence, do yourself a favor and skip the link. We’ll try to convey WHISPER’s message more delicately in what follows, but understand that there is nothingdelicate or tender about the sex of prostitution.

One of the main points at the heart of the debate about the full decriminalization of prostitution (by this we mean the removal of all laws and any regulations around prostitution, the removal of which infer a right for persons to barter and trade other persons for sexual consumption in brothels, strip and night clubs, street corners) is what one believes about work.

While there are several meanings ascribed to the term, for the purpose of this discussion work should be understood as the labor, task, or duty that is one’s means of livelihood. For most people work is a necessary part of ensuring one’s survival: we work as the means to earn our wages and to sustain ourselves and those we love. For some, work may be a drudgery, a toil to be endured; for others, it may be a passion—a lifelong pursuit of one’s deepest interests and aspirations. From banking, engineering, janitorial service, the insurance industry, food service, education, medical professions, agriculture, journalism, law enforcement, aviation, to horticulture and beyond, there are a myriad of occupations in which one may work.

But this work is typically pursued within parameters. As a society we recognize that work should be performed within certain boundaries, and thus create rules concerning how it is carried out, such as the number of hours and days per week one must work, the number of sick days granted, and the minimum wages one can be paid. We also define certain conditions in which the work must be carried out—for instance mitigating the risk of injuries due to environmental hazards, and prohibiting certain activities such as smoking or drug use in the workplace, as well as racial discrimination and sexual harassment.

It hasn’t always been this way. Current labor conditions in the United States are the result of generations of reforms (and even a civil war which resulted in a constitutional prohibition of slavery). And, while the current American labor context is no panacea, in many parts of the world others dream of working under the rights and protections ascribed to American workers.

But whether one lives and works in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan, or Brazil, or Italy, Syria, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Thailand, or anywhere else on the planet, what does it mean if one’s livelihood by means of prostitution is a normalized form of work?

It means that that your daily existence will likely entail:

  • routine verbal degradation[1];
  • threat of physical assault and a wide array of physical injury;
  • extreme risk of sexual assault and rape;
  • being groped, pinched, licked, bitten and breathed upon by people who pay to use you;
  • serial utilization of one’s orifices as a receptacle for male genitalia and other objects;
  • likely acquisition of alcohol and/or drug addiction;
  • likely acquisition of post-traumatic stress disorder;
  • likely acquisition of any number of (potentially incurable) STDs; and
  • possible premature death as the result of homicide.

In practical terms, it also means that while you experience these abuses and injuries:

  • others will have a “right” to profit from the sale of your body;
  • others will have a “right” to sexually access your body as long as they paid to do so (and even if they don’t);
  • sexual harassment, assault, and rape are on-the-job requirements;
  • law enforcement will look the other way, as no “crimes” have been committed;
  • the public will at best turn a blind eye to your plight, or at worst mock your abuse by calling it “your job.”

Thus, experiences that the rest of the world’s workers are protected from–or, at a minimum, most rational members of society believe they should be protected from–comprise the core duties and conditions of “employment” for those in prostitution. Some “job.”

At NCOSE we recognize that the overwhelming majority of persons in prostitution around the world have turned to prostitution not because it’s a fantastic experience and they love the “benefits,” but because they were groomed for it, sold into it, can’t escape it, and/or have no other means to support themselves.

But whatever the circumstances by which they became entangled in the sex trade, we believe people deserve better than prostitution. We believe sexual exploitation is nobody’s “job.”


[1] See the NCOSE fact sheet on physical and sexual violence in prostitution for studies and citations.

Amnesty International (also known as Amnesty) is a nongovernmental organization founded in 1961 by British lawyer Peter Benenson to defend human rights.

Delegates to Amnesty International’s (AI) biennial International Council Meeting (ICM) held in August, 2015, approved a resolution authorizing AI’s International Board to adopt a new policy calling for the full decriminalization of prostitution worldwide.

Amnesty’s official policy paper on prostitution was released on May 26, 2016. Despite the objections of survivors of the sex trade and women’s rights groups around the world, Amnesty’s paper maintained the organization’s call for full decriminalization of prostitution. Thus, Amnesty joined the global movement seeking to normalize sexual exploitation.

Purportedly, Amnesty is concerned about the corruption, abuses, and violence associated with prostitution. Their answer to these problems is uncomplicated: simply erase prostitution laws from books.

Full decriminalization of prostitution does just that—it removes laws pertaining to all adult parties in prostitution, including not only the individual being purchased for sex, but also sex buyers, as well as brothel keepers, madams, and pimps—sometimes euphemistically referred to as “third-party operators.” If prostitution is decriminalized—meaning there are no laws banning or regulating pimping, sex buying or selling (for those 18 years old and above, they are quick to clarify)—then no prostitution laws are there to be broken, no crimes are committed, and all those concerned can go about the business of buying and selling sex in peace.

If the objective is a vibrant and flourishing sex trade, then full decriminalization of prostitution is the ticket. It removes all legal barriers for those who seek to “manage” sex selling, as well as for those seeking to buy sexual access to other human beings. Thus, Amnesty’s approach for addressing sexual exploitation has been adapted from the old adage, “if you can’t beat them join them.”

At the National Center on Sexual Exploitation take a decidedly different view on the matter. We believe prostitution is a system of sexual exploitation that requires Abolition, not social sanction.[1] It is a system whereby individuals are supplied as public, sexual commodities, and which preys upon vulnerable members of society. It is rife with violence against those sold for sex. Full decriminalization of prostitution in no way rectifies the conditions of inequality, abuse, violence, and dehumanization which animate all forms of prostitution—it tragically assents to them.

Inexplicably, Amnesty has failed to recognize that the very act of prostitution should be considered sexual exploitation, since the exchange of money (or something of value) to obtain a sex act is an act of sexual coercion. As legal scholar Catherine McKinnon has argued, “In these transactions, the money coerces the sex rather than guaranteeing consent to it, making prostitution a practice of serial rape.”

Mitigating and eventually abolishing the harms of prostitution requires robust efforts to prosecute those who organize the sexual exploitation of others (i.e., pimps, sex traffickers, madams, brothel keepers, etc.), as well as the sex buyers who utilize their services. Anything less gives pimps and sex buyers a license to engage in sexual exploitation.

In sum, full decriminalization of prostitution grants impunity to sex traffickers, magically morphing them into reputable, sexually-oriented business entrepreneurs, and mystically transforming sex buyers into “respectable” clients.

Take Action

Are You in Washington DC?

If you are a resident of Washington DC:

  • Attend the upcoming DC Council Judiciary Committee hearing on this bill, scheduled to begin at 10:00 AM on Oct 17, at the WilsonBuilding (1350 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC) in room 412. Ask friends to join you.


  • Request to offer 5 minute testimony in opposition to the bill. Sign up to testify by emailing the Judiciary Committee at In your email, you must provide your name, telephone number, organizational affiliation, and title (if any) by the close of business on Monday, October 14th.

Take A Stand Against the Full Decriminalization of Prostitution

Sign this petition to call on policymakers to oppose the full decriminalization of prostitution, and to instead embrace abolitionist principles to provide exit services to those in the sex trade and to focus law enforcement resources on combating the demand (sex buyers).


Learn More about Prostitution

Visit our website exposing truths about prostitution here.

Visit our webpage on prostitution

Learn more about these issues also by visiting the websites of the other groups listed at the bottom of this page. 

Share your STORY

Personal stories help elected and business leaders to see the grave harm associated with this material and can be very helpful in getting them to change their policies. All will be shared anonymously. Please email your story to

Stay updated on these projects

Button Join the movement

Subscribe to our email lists

Expert Commentary


D.C. Poised to Open Floodgate of Sexual Exploitation and Trafficking

Under the guise of improving “community safety and health,” D.C. Councilmembers David Grosso, Anita Bonds, Brianne Nadeau, and Robert White have put forward D.C. Bill 23-0318 (a.k.a. The Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019) which, if passed, will amend existing D.C. statutes to fully decriminalize prostitution in the nation’s capital. The proposed bill…

Opponents of a bill in the DC City Council that would fully decriminalize prostitution in Washington DC (Bill 23-0318 a.k.a. The Community Safety and Health Act of 2019) stand outside of a public hearing on October 17, 2019

DC’s “Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019”: A Trojan Horse Empowering and Expanding the Sex Trade in the Nation’s Capital

Under the guise of improving “community safety and health,” DC Council members David Grosso, Anita Bonds, Brianne Nadeau, and Robert White have put forward the above referenced bill (23-0318) which, if passed, will amend existing DC statutes to fully decriminalize and deregulate prostitution in the nation’s capital. The proposed bill seeks to decriminalize pimps, brothel…

The Failure of Legalizing Prostitution in The Netherlands

In 2000 the Dutch lifted the ban of brothel-keeping and by doing so they legalized prostitution. The intentions were good: improve conditions for women in prostitution and combat human trafficking. Almost twenty years later, the Dutch have to admit their policy, which they deemed progressive and pragmatic, has totally failed. As the mayor of Amsterdam…

Washington Post: D.C.’s bill to decriminalize prostitution would hurt the people it aims to help

Below is an excerpt from the article published in the Washington Post recognizing the harms of fully decriminalizing prostitution. Learn more here. DECRIMINALING PROSTITUTION has become a priority for the progressive movement, and the movement is slowly picking up steam across the country. That it seems to have found a receptive audience with the D.C. Council is…

Bright Light on the Red Light: Exposing The Harms of Legal and Deregulated Prostitution

This panel analyses the harms of both legal and deregulated (or fully decriminalized) prostitution on prostituted persons, sex trafficked persons, and the culture. Donna M. Hughes is a Professor at the University of Rhode Island (URI) in Gender and Women’s Studies Program and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Program. She holds the Eleanor M. and…

Washingtonian Article Calls Out the Harms of Fully Decriminalizing Prostitution in DC

Below is an excerpt from the article published on the Washingtonian recognizing the harms of fully decriminalizing prostitution. Learn more here. DC Council Bill Would Turn Our Nation’s Capital Into a Capital for Sex Tourism and Trafficking I wish I could say I was shocked by the sex trafficking charges against Jeffrey Epstein. But as someone who…

Banning Red Light District Tours is Not Enough to Stop Exploitation

“The tours have provided the propaganda that would have tourists believe that legalised prostitution has been a massive success. It has, but only for the pimps and other profiteers.” These are the words of Julie Bindel, feminist scholar and writer reporting on the notorious red light district in Amsterdam, where the city recently announced they…

Amnesty International Expels Member for Standing Against Prostitution

Marcia Lieberman was a long-time local coordinator for Amnesty International. For 38 years, she had been a loyal active member of Amnesty International. Then, with the flick of a pen, the board of directors expelled her. Lieberman’s expulsion followed from a protracted fight against Amnesty International’s adoption of a new policy expressing official support for…

[Video] Sexploitation Is Nobody’s Job: A Panel Discussion Review of Legal Approaches to Prostitution

This presentation discusses the different legal models or approaches to prostitution, including criminalization, legalization, decriminalization, and the Nordic model, and their impact on the prevalence of sex trafficking. Watch Here: This panel presentation was given at the 2016 Coalition to End Sexual Exploitation (CESE) Summit. To learn more visit • Lisa Thompson, National Center…

panel legal approaches to prostitution

How NCOSE Staff Helped Stop New Hampshire from Decriminalizing Prostitution

An organized effort in New Hampshire to remove all laws controlling prostitution was defeated this week. This issue first began in 2016, when House Bill 1614 to fully decriminalize prostitution was introduced into the New Hampshire House of Representatives by Representatives Elizabeth Edwards, Amanda Bouldin, and Carol McGuire. This bill failed to pass. But these…


Use these tools to help educate others on the problems with the full decriminalization of prostitution. 


DC’s Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019: A Trojan Horse Empowering & Expanding the Sex Trade in the Nation’s Capital

Other Groups

Find more information about prostitution-related issues through these organizations.

Jerome Elam

President & CEO

Trafficking in America Task Force

Trafficked Boys: Invisible Victims of HT

Lena Walther

Consul of Sweden to Nevada

Co-Founder of Awareness Is Prevention

The Effectiveness of The Swedish Model

Dave Betz

Director of Accreditation

National Children’s Alliance

Child Victims: How We Are Serving Our Most Vulnerable Population

dr donna hughes

Donna M. Hughes, Ph.D.

Eleanor M. and Oscar M. Carlson Endowed Chair in Women’s Studies, Professor Gender and Women’s Studies and Criminology and Criminal Justice Programs, University of Rhode Island

University of Rhode Island

Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence; AND PANEL: Bright Light on the Red Light: Exposing the Harms of Legal & Deregulated Prostitution

Valaura Imus-Nahsonhoya

Founder and Executive Director

Honwungsi Consulting Services

Sex Trafficking and Exploitation in Native American Populations

Jay Taylor


A Call to Men

Promoting Healthy Manhood in Digital Spaces

Brian Kent


Laffey, Bucci & Kent

Institutional Sexual Abuse and Harassment: Prevention, Response and Survivor’s Rights and Remedies

Beverly Hallberg


District Media Group

On-Camera Television Training

Karla Bruno

Director of Foundation and Corporate Relations

Leadership Institute

You Can’t Save the World If You Can’t Pay the Rent: Real Fundraising for Real Change

Stephen Rowe

Deputy Director of Digital Training

Leadership Institute

Social Media in Public Policy

Chris McKenna


Protect Young Eyes

Before They Need It: How To Promote Prevention for Families and Children

Tiffany Short, MSW, LCSW

Child Victim Program Coordinator

Federal Bureau of Investigation, Victim Assistance Division Child Victim Services Unit