What Teen Vogue Got Wrong About CDA 230, The Internet’s Liability Shield
Teen Vogue, fueled by Big Tech lobbyists, claims that removing the Internet’s liability shield will harm children. Learn why they’re wrong.
Teen Vogue, fueled by Big Tech lobbyists, claims that removing the Internet’s liability shield will harm children. Learn why they’re wrong.
Predators use AI to create child sexual abuse material (“child pornography”) of existing or fictitious children. What can we do?
“Boys for Sale.” This was the text displayed on a Reddit post found by a NCOSE researcher this month. The post also featured an image
Pornhub has released its annual “Year in Review”. But here’s what the year REALLY looked like for them.
Meta’s dangerous new policy nullifies its ability to detect and report child sexual exploitation.
Historic court ruling against Pornhub + new shocking undercover investigation
CDA 230 has been misinterpreted by the courts as granting blanket immunity for tech companies to facilitate sexual exploitation. Take Action!
Last week, over 250 advocates gathered in Washington, DC to urge congress to fight online sexual exploitation!
Benjamin Franklin once said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” And with your help, we are moving far beyond a mere “ounce” of prevention.
An undercover investigation and internal emails found through legal discovery reaffirm Pornhub’s shocking tolerance of child sexual abuse and rape.
Thanks to Microsoft-owned GitHub, any of us could be sexually exploited in less time than it takes to brew a cup of coffee.
Join us in calling on the 118th Congress to make this the Child Protection Congress by passing key child protection legislation!